• Sticking it to Instruction

    November 5, 2008

    Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Sur­vive and Oth­ers Die by Chip Heath & Dan Heath

    Photo by Flickr member houseofsims

    Photo by Flickr mem­ber houseofsims

    I always feel the need to pref­ace my praise for this book with a lit­tle back­ground. I’ve read a slew of best sell­ers on behav­ior. I started when a friend was rav­ing about Mal­colm Glad­well. I picked up Blink and The Tip­ping Point and read through them to join in the dis­cus­sion. I was gen­er­ally enter­tained but not par­tic­u­larly blown away. Then I read Pre­dictably Irra­tional in prepa­ra­tion for a panel with Dr. Ariely at ALA last year. The reviews com­pared it to Freako­nom­ics, so I read that one too. Fig­ur­ing I was on a roll, I ran into Sway and added it to my list. They were all quick, easy, and enter­tain­ing reads. But Made to Stick was the first to truly inspire me. I had to stop every cou­ple of pages and share a pas­sage with some­one or make a note to myself about how I could apply a con­cept to my work. I’m not claim­ing that Made to Stick is full of rev­o­lu­tion­ary ideas. It’s not. It’s also not a librar­i­an­ship book. It’s not even a teach­ing book. It’s a mar­ket­ing book, and yet page after page I found ideas to apply in my infor­ma­tion lit­er­acy classes and to other areas of librar­i­an­ship. What Made to Stick does have are excel­lent exam­ples across var­i­ous dis­ci­plines. (It also has a nice sized font and a con­ver­sa­tional tone that make for easy gym reading.)

    I would like to share some of the insights that stuck with me, and, in the process, encour­age you to read out­side your typ­i­cal areas and think of how you can apply what you learn to your work. Right now, in my per­sonal prac­tice, I’m focus­ing on my teach­ing and how to make my one shot pre­sen­ta­tions more effec­tive, both with my stu­dents in the library and at con­fer­ences. The exam­ples that dealt with teach­ing and the pos­si­ble appli­ca­tions that struck me while read­ing are the ones that stuck with me, but there’s so much more to mine here, espe­cially in terms of man­age­ment and marketing.

    The Heaths “wrote this book to help you make your ideas stick. By ‘stick,’ we mean that your ideas are under­stood and remem­bered, and have a last­ing impact — they change your audience’s opin­ions or behav­ior.” With that in mind they orga­nized the book (and titled the chap­ters) around 6 major qual­i­ties of sticky ideas:

    • Sim­plic­ity
    • Unex­pect­ed­ness
    • Con­crete­ness
    • Cred­i­bil­ity
    • Emo­tions
    • Sto­ries

    Again, none of this is rev­o­lu­tion­ary, but the exam­ples (con­crete­ness) and the Idea Clin­ics (side­bar thought exer­cises) in each chap­ter bring home the points. The acronym of SUC­CESs was a lit­tle cheesy for my taste, but as one of my review­ers pointed out, librar­i­ans love acronyms and peo­ple remem­ber mnemon­ics. So if it helps you, use it.

    Sim­ple

    In the chap­ter on “Sim­ple” there is an excel­lent detailed expla­na­tion of mil­i­tary strat­egy and the impor­tance of the Commander’s Intent. The Commander’s Intent is the one line sum­mary of the main objec­tive, writ­ten at the top of the doc­u­ment that spells out the full strat­egy. There fol­lows a detailed plan for how to achieve this, but there’s also a say­ing, “No plan sur­vives con­tact with the enemy.” The mes­sage here is to find the core of the idea. The corol­lary is, “No les­son plan sur­vives con­tact with teenagers,” some­thing that I can relate to in my instruc­tion. In fact, the major­ity of my ses­sions to cowork­ers begin with my ask­ing them what they hope to get out of the class. I then sketch out the details of the les­son plan on-the-fly based on their answers. I have my Commander’s Intent in the form of the topic of the ses­sion, but am free to rearrange the actual class time based on the learn­ers’ needs. I am still work­ing on how to pull this method into my one shot classes, where the stu­dents are much less likely to be there of their own voli­tion and there­fore less likely to have per­sonal objec­tives for the class.

    Made to Stick stresses that mak­ing an idea sim­ple is “about ele­gance and pri­or­i­ti­za­tion, not dumb­ing down.” I’ve been strug­gling to deter­mine how much infor­ma­tion to cover in my one shot ses­sions. My main objec­tive that I repeat through­out my pre­sen­ta­tion is, “I don’t expect you to remem­ber how to do all of this. I want you to remem­ber that the librar­i­ans know it and you can always come to us with ques­tions.” Like­wise when I cover eval­u­at­ing web sites, I’ve cut it down to “Ask your­self ‘Who wrote this?’” Yes, there’s much more to it, but not much more that can be cov­ered and absorbed in such a short period of time. “Peo­ple are tempted to tell you every­thing, with per­fect accu­racy, right up front, when they should be giv­ing you just enough info to be use­ful, then a lit­tle more, then a lit­tle more.” I think so many of us strug­gle against this Curse of Knowl­edge — hav­ing dif­fi­culty see­ing what we’re try­ing to teach through the eyes of some­one who doesn’t already know it. “As a result, we become lousy com­mu­ni­ca­tors.” Work­ing to make our ideas sim­ple is prob­a­bly the most chal­leng­ing idea cov­ered in the book, but cer­tainly worth the effort.

    Unex­pected

    The Nordstrom’s cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing teams use a list of unex­pected exam­ples to drive home the impor­tance of out­stand­ing cus­tomer ser­vice. Some sto­ries of out­stand­ing “Nordies” include the sales­per­son who warmed the customer’s car while he fin­ished shop­ping, the one who ironed a customer’s shirt so he could wear it later that day and the one who refunded a set of tire chains — even though Nordstrom’s doesn’t sell tire chains. Telling peo­ple some­thing unex­pected shakes them out of their stan­dard assump­tions. Most peo­ple would pre­sume to know what good cus­tomer ser­vice is, but the unex­pected story of warm­ing a customer’s car causes them to reeval­u­ate the mean­ing of outstanding.

    This brings up another com­mon prob­lem in my classes: bat­tling over-confidence. If my stu­dents assume they already know every­thing they need to know about doing research, why would they want to lis­ten to me? Both Made to Stick and one of my col­leagues have sug­gested the same solu­tion: engage peo­ple by hav­ing them vote pub­licly and com­mit to an answer. Made to Stick tells of a study of 5th and 6th graders who were assigned to inter­act on a topic. They were bro­ken into two groups. One group’s con­ver­sa­tion was lead to fos­ter dis­agree­ment, the other group’s con­ver­sa­tion was steered towards con­sen­sus. The group whose dis­cus­sion had more dis­agree­ments was more likely to skip recess to watch a video on the topic. They were more engaged than the group that quickly came to con­sen­sus. As I reviewed this sec­tion I was reminded of a recent dis­cus­sion over iClick­ers. One of my cowork­ers said that she has the stu­dents vote on whether a par­tic­u­lar site is appro­pri­ate for col­lege level research. After they vote she has them find some­one with the oppo­site point of view and try to per­suade them. She has them vote again after their dis­cus­sion and finds that the major­ity have come around the the right conclusion.

    Con­crete

    World class cus­tomer ser­vice” is abstract. A Nordie iron­ing a customer’s shirt is con­crete. Sim­ple and unex­pected are hard and take effort. Being con­crete just takes remem­ber­ing to do it and not slip­ping into the Curse of Knowl­edge. There are a num­ber of great uses of con­crete­ness in terms of mar­ket­ing in this sec­tion. In one exam­ple the peo­ple behind Ham­burger Helper took the abstract idea of their users and nonusers and made them into con­crete detailed pic­tures of indi­vid­u­als. The Ham­burger Helper prod­uct team had mul­ti­ple binders full of data on their cus­tomers, so much that it was over­whelm­ing. They put the binders aside and sent small groups into homes where they saw that moth­ers val­ued pre­dictabil­ity in fla­vor and con­ve­nience to make. See­ing the mother search­ing for her child’s old famil­iar fla­vor on the shelf amongst a slew of new alter­na­tives and then prepar­ing din­ner with a child on her hip made the idea of con­ve­nience con­crete. Ham­burger Helper ended up sim­pli­fy­ing the prod­uct line and, sub­squently, increas­ing sales. Cre­at­ing a con­crete, detailed descrip­tion of your library’s users sounds like an excel­lent exer­cise for an all staff day or, even bet­ter, an out­come of a full blown user study. At my com­mu­nity col­lege we would likely cre­ate three: the transitioning-to-a-4-year-university stu­dent, the two-year-certificate/workforce stu­dent, and the con­tin­u­ing edu­ca­tion student.

    Cred­i­ble

    Author­ity and celebrity are two ways to boost your cred­i­bil­ity, but thank­fully this chap­ter spends more time on options that are read­ily avail­able to the aver­age per­son. One such option is the anti-authority. Take Pam Laf­fin — the 29 year old who started smok­ing at age 10, devel­oped emphy­sema by 24, and suf­fered a failed lung trans­plant. Pam became an anti-smoking spokesper­son appear­ing in ads on MTV and Dawson’s Creek. Using these kinds of vivid con­crete details and putting things on a human scale are two alter­na­tive ways to evoke cred­i­bil­ity. To show just how pow­er­ful details can be, the authors tell the story of a study in which jurors were decid­ing a cus­tody case. The jurors were more likely to believe the defen­dant was a good mother if her tes­ti­mony included the spe­cific descrip­tion that the boy used a Darth Vader tooth­brush while she ensured that he brushed his teeth at night. This lit­tle detail of the type of tooth­brush lent sig­nif­i­cant cred­i­bil­ity to her tes­ti­mony. One of my cowork­ers tells a cau­tion­ary story of the stu­dent who waited to the last minute and tried to find every­thing online and the one who fol­lowed the steps she was about to teach them for good research. What other ways can we bring instruc­tion out of the abstract, into the spe­cific and human?

    One of the most applic­a­ble ideas in this sec­tion is that of testable cre­den­tials. The book gives two great exam­ples of this. First is Ronald Rea­gan ask­ing the Amer­i­can pub­lic in his 1980 pres­i­den­tial debate, “Are you bet­ter off now than you were four years ago?” The sec­ond exam­ple is taken from a work­shop held by the Pos­i­tive Coach­ing Alliance. The train­ers “use the anal­ogy of an ‘Emo­tional Tank’ to get coaches to think about the right ratio of praise, sup­port and crit­i­cal feed­back.” They ask the coaches to say some­thing to drain a player’s tank after he has flubbed a key play. The coaches excel at this. When they are asked to fill the tank the room goes silent. “Observ­ing their own behav­ior, the coaches learn the les­son — how they found it eas­ier to crit­i­cize than to sup­port, to think of ten clever insults rather than a sin­gle con­so­la­tion. [They] found a way to trans­form [their] point into a testable cre­den­tial, some­thing the coaches could expe­ri­ence for them­selves.” I know that my instruc­tion could ben­e­fit from rely­ing less on the author­ity and lec­ture angle. It’s a hard habit to break, espe­cially since the lec­ture style is my per­sonal pre­ferred learn­ing method, but I also see the need to fos­ter increased crit­i­cal think­ing skills, allow­ing stu­dents to rea­son through more lessons on their own.

    Emo­tional

    This was my favorite chap­ter. Get­ting peo­ple to believe you is only one step in chang­ing minds. To take action, they have to care. There are a num­ber of incred­i­bly com­pelling sto­ries in this chap­ter. There’s the effec­tive­ness of char­ity on a human scale (spon­sor­ing a child rather than giv­ing to the gen­eral cause) summed up by the quote from Mother Teresa, “If I look at the mass, I will never act. If I look at the one, I will.” And there’s the suc­cess of the Truth cig­a­rette cam­paign, which tapped into anti author­i­tar­i­an­ism. The authors also remind us not to over­look self inter­est — what’s in it for you? They dis­cuss Maslow’s Pyra­mid and com­ment that most self inter­est appeals invoke the phys­i­cal, secu­rity, and esteem lay­ers. We need to come out of Maslow’s base­ment. The shin­ing exam­ple of this is the mil­i­tary mess hall oper­a­tor who deemed him­self in charge of morale (transendence on Maslow’s pyra­mid). He has sol­diers that com­mute in from the well-protected Amer­i­can­ized areas just for Sun­day din­ner. We tend to real­ize higher level appeals work on us, but then assume we need to appeal to the base needs of others.

    This chap­ter also has an excel­lent idea clinic on the need for alge­bra. It begins with the ques­tion “Why study alge­bra?” and a typ­i­cal con­fer­ence answer suf­fer­ing from the Curse of Knowl­edge which includes gems like “Alge­bra pro­vides pro­ce­dures for manip­u­lat­ing sym­bols to allow for under­stand­ing the world around us.” The fol­low­ing slightly bet­ter exam­ple has things like, you need it to get your diploma, it will help you with rea­son­ing skills, etc. But then the winner:

    “This is a response from a high school alge­bra teacher, Dean Sher­man, to an Inter­net dis­cus­sion of this topic among high school teachers:
    My grade 9 stu­dents have dif­fi­culty appre­ci­at­ing the use­ful­ness of the Stan­dard Form of the equa­tion of a line, prompt­ing them to ask, “When are we ever going to need this?”

    This ques­tion used to really bother me, and I would look, as a result, for jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for every­thing I taught. Now I say, “Never. You will never use this.”

    I then go on to remind them that peo­ple don’t lift weights so that they will be pre­pared should, one day, [some­one] knock them over on the street and lay a bar­bell across their chests. You lift weights so that you can knock over a defen­sive line­man, or carry your gro­ceries or lift your grand­chil­dren with­out being sore the next day. You do math exer­cises so that you can improve your abil­ity to think log­i­cally, so that you can be a bet­ter lawyer, doc­tor, archi­tect, prison war­den or parent.

    MATH IS MENTAL WEIGHT TRAINING. It is a means to an end (for most peo­ple), and not an end in itself.”

    Sto­ries

    Sto­ries “pro­vides sim­u­la­tion (knowl­edge about how to act) and inspi­ra­tion (moti­va­tion to act). Note that both ben­e­fits, sim­u­la­tion and inspi­ra­tion, are geared towards gen­er­at­ing action … we’ve seen that a cred­i­ble idea makes peo­ple believe. An Emo­tional idea makes peo­ple care …the right sto­ries make peo­ple act.” There are a num­ber of great sto­ries in this sec­tion, but the most impor­tant aspect for me was the empha­sis on the art of spot­ting — not mak­ing up — these sto­ries. We encounter inspir­ing sto­ries all the time. I know that a num­ber of libraries col­lect these sto­ries from their patrons and put them on their web sites. This sec­tion has ideas on how to spot ones that are most likely to inspire oth­ers to action. I will be look­ing for ways to incor­po­rate more sto­ries into my instruc­tion, but I think the real strength here would be in pro­mot­ing libraries to our com­mu­ni­ties at large.

    I hope that I’ve inspired you to pick up a copy of Made to Stick, read through it your­self and look for ways to apply some of the ideas it explains. The ideas from Made to Stick are also a good exam­ple of how read­ing out­side the library lit­er­a­ture can help us expand our prac­tice with­out rein­vent­ing the wheel. There are so many options. You can start with the straight one to one cor­re­la­tion. Inter­ested in mar­ket­ing in your library? Read gen­eral mar­ket­ing con­tent. Same goes for man­age­ment, teach­ing, pre­sent­ing, etc. Also con­sider going to pri­mary sources. Watch good pre­sen­ta­tions and think about what was good about them. Swap out “pre­sen­ta­tions” for “man­agers” or “teach­ers” and do it again. I’m also includ­ing a list of sug­ges­tions for fur­ther read­ing, mostly on pre­sent­ing, that I’ve found inspir­ing recently. If you have sug­ges­tions to add to the list that have inspired you or ways you’ve incor­po­rated some of these ideas, please let me know in the comments.

    Sug­ges­tions for fur­ther reading:


    Many thanks to Derik Bad­man, Char Booth, and Gretchen Keer for their feed­back and edits.

    You might also be inter­ested in:

9 Comments

  • Emily says:

    Inter­est­ing thoughts!

    Me, I’m totally pro-reading out­side the lit­er­a­ture. Right now I’m read­ing a lot of basic writ­ing lit­er­a­ture. Did you know (I say in a tone of self-mocking incredulity) that there’s a whole uni­verse of crit­i­cally engaged the­ory and prac­ti­cal guid­ance about how to teach con­crete writ­ing skills to basic writ­ers? And that some of that theory/practice applies to my research skills instruc­tion to that same sub­set of stu­dents? The added advan­tage of read­ing this kind of stuff is that it gives me some cred­i­bil­ity when I talk to fac­ulty. I’m read­ing what they read and write, and that helps make me leg­i­ble to them as part of the same instruc­tional com­mu­nity. Which means, I hope, in the long run, that they’ll bring some classes in.

    Also! Speak­ing of cred­i­bilty! I find it helps me look like a cred­i­ble ‘fel­low scholar’ (which is how I try to cast myself and my stu­dents in the class­room) to take seri­ously the way these begin­ning schol­ars do their own research. They Google first. Frankly, so do I. And admit­ting that upfront actu­ally seems to cap­ture their atten­tion. Maybe I’m rel­e­vant after all, I think they think!

  • Very nice, Ellie.

    I echo the impor­tance of look­ing out­side library lit. (Who can stand to read most of it in the first place?)

    I know it’s hard to do finan­cially but attend­ing non­li­brar­ian aca­d­e­mic con­fer­ences has helped me. One on crit­i­cal think­ing rad­i­cally changed me. http://​www​.crit​i​cal​think​ing​.org/​c​o​n​f​e​r​e​n​c​e​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​cfm

    Also the League for Inno­va­tion in the Com­mu­nity Col­lege con­fer­ences were all good. They empha­sis techie stuff more than teach­ing but it was a bunch of smart peo­ple doing inter­est­ing things. http://​www​.league​.org/

  • Ellie says:

    Thanks guys. And thanks Red for point­ing out those con­fer­ences. I just went to a psy­chol­ogy con­fer­ence this week­end and it was a very inter­est­ing expe­ri­ence, and def­i­nitely gave me insight into early child­hood devel­op­ment (one of my col­lec­tion areas).

  • I decided a few days ago to read Made to Stick before com­ment­ing on this piece. Actu­ally, I decided to read Made to Stick even before I read Ellie’s review.

    Last week was a busy one at my place of work – a small, inde­pen­dent library in a boxy, brick, 70’s build­ing. We got approval to buy 12 new com­put­ers and we had to move half our col­lec­tion to make space for them. Have you ever moved a few thou­sand books in two days? Remem­ber the bruised thumbs, numb biceps, and con­stant sneezing?

    So that’s why I decided, after read­ing Ellie’s open­ing para­graph, to put off read­ing her piece until the week­end – I was just too busy last week even to read a short book review. And then, on Fri­day, I decided that, before read­ing her review, I would read the book first.

    Why, if I was too busy to read a 15-paragraph review, would I decide to read a 300-page book? Think about that. Have you ever made that kind of deci­sion? “I’m not exer­cis­ing at all. Why don’t I run a marathon next fall?”

    Per­son­ally, I made this deci­sion for six reasons:

    1. Kim’s piece had a sim­ple but pro­found mes­sage: we should be famil­iar with a topic before we com­ment on it.

    2. I unex­pect­edly hap­pened on the book while I was mov­ing our non­fic­tion sec­tion. Kismet!

    3. Ellie’s image for the piece – that duct-tape man – must have estab­lished a con­crete image in my mind, because when I moved an orange book that appeared to have duct tape stuck to it, I knew imme­di­ately that I’d found Made to Stick.

    4. Every­one involved Dan Ariely’s pre­sen­ta­tion was great, but she was the one who came up with ques­tions for him that the rest of us, as her fel­low pan­elists, ended up bor­row­ing from her. That’s credibility.

    5. Okay, I’ll admit it: emo­tion­ally, I have an over­whelm­ing desire to be the kind of per­son who reads books before com­ment­ing on reviews of that book. I’ve come to think of that desire as my inner librarian.

    6. Ellie’s story in the open­ing para­graph stuck with me, in that I got sucked into the same books in much the same way. If I hadn’t unex­pect­edly run across the book in our col­lec­tion I may have fin­ished read­ing her review before I read the book, but a) I sus­pect that I still wouldn’t have com­mented on her review with­out read­ing the book first, and b) com­ing across the book, and hav­ing iden­ti­fied with her story, I knew I had to read the book prior to fin­ish­ing the review.

    So that’s how Ellie’s open­ing para­graph helped spur me into action. It made me want to read the book, and it pre­pared me to com­ment on her review – which, I think, was excel­lent: she skill­fully con­veys the authors’ mes­sage and accom­pa­ny­ing anec­dotes. Read­ing her review isn’t the same thing as read­ing the book, but it’s the next best thing. Thanks, Ellie, for the review, rec­om­men­da­tion, and reminder to read out­side the field.

  • […] (must be the craftsper­son in me). So a blog post fea­tur­ing a giant roll of duct tape and titled Stick­ing it to Instruc­tion was suc­cess­ful in divert­ing my atten­tion from my over-crowded […]

  • […] through blogs this morn­ing, Betha’s post on CE Buzz led me to Ellie’s post on In the Library with the Lead­pipe (love the blog name!), which dis­cusses a book by Chip Heath […]

  • Robert L. says:

    Great review, thanks. I’ll use some of this in my classes and look up the book as well.

  • […] expe­ri­ence or inter­est.  In her Novem­ber 5, 2008 post on this blog, Ellie Col­lier dis­cusses “sticky ideas” and the value of sim­ple, unex­pected, con­crete, cred­i­ble, emo­tional sto­ries.  Special […]

  • […] Drib­bling anal­ogy – when you teach kids to play bas­ket­ball you have a lot of drib­bling prac­tice. Trans­late that into infor­ma­tion lit­er­acy prac­tice exer­cises. For exam­ple – have the stu­dents sum­ma­rize an arti­cle every Fri­day. This one fit well with the story about math as men­tal weightlift­ing that I read about in Made to Stick. […]

Subscribe to comments for this post:

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Powered by WordPress | Original Theme by mg12 Edited by Derik. | Valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 3